The Decline of Grand Theory A Critique of Analytical Eclecticism in International Relations

Authors

  • Author

  • Sid Ahmed Goudjili

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31430//WVZF1476

Keywords:

Analytical Selectivity, Grand Theory, International Relations Theory

Abstract

​The splitting, renaming and merging of factions can lead to the start of new rivalries, or in some cases, end existing ones. A new faction may inherit the original faction's previous rivalries with other groups, and if a faction name change results in a total restructure, it may signal the end of the rivalry. However, this was not the case when Jabhat al-Nusra renamed itself Jabhat Fatah al-Sham, and later Tahrir al-Sham. It was considered a 'cosmetic' and superficial change because it did not develop a new structure. This article will shed light on exclusionary politics and the political ramifications of sectarianism caused by certain jihadist movements, such as Jabhat al-Nusra (presently known as Tahrir al-Sham), enabling us to analyse its practices, especially towards minorities, and sectarian ideologies present in Idlib, and which ultimately led to the expulsion of many who fled outside the governorate. The article also calls attention to the roles of regional and international powers in Idlib against the backdrop of opposition factions, and their physical and ideological influence on Islamist forces that frequently facilitated displacement within and outside the city.

Author Biography

  • Sid Ahmed Goudjili
    Assistant Proffesore, Departement of Critical Security Studies, Doha Institite for Graduate Studies. Email: sidahmed.goudjili@dohainstitute.edu.qa

Published

2022-05-01

Cited twice

  1. الانتقائيُّ التحليليُّ والنظريات الكبرى: زهَّار أم نحلة؟ "مِن كل بستانٍ زهرةٌ" أم "شرابٌ مختلفٌ ألوانُه فيه شفاءٌ للناس"؟ (2022)
  2. البنائية في حقل العلاقات الدولية: المدارك والمسالك (2025)